www.NeilgaimanBoard.com
www.NeilgaimanBoard.com
The World's End
FLAME WARS
Is Panda a horrible racist?|
Go
![]() |
New
![]() |
Find
![]() |
Notify
![]() |
Tools
![]() |
Reply
![]() |
|
|
is in perfect karmic alignment Member |
The personal comments aside (which i couldn't know less about) a big amen to that, and i shall now bump the "Hot Guys" thread....
~You are a *Taverner*. Sometimes patrons want to go where everybody knows their names, though it helps when half of them are named John. When people want to celebrate, or commiserate, they gather to your establishment. You provide the atmosphere, the warmth, rum, and even an ear to bend. Did I mention the rum? Years before the language will be mangled with terms like facilitator and networking and interpersonal communication, you've overseen it all, and broken up a few bar fights, to boot.~ -Royko |
|||
|
|
Goofy Beast Member |
Nope, sorry, don't buy it. I agree with you, but that's not what you've been saying in the past. Unless I completely misunderstood your earlier posts, Fallen, you've always argued that in a system that advocates free speech, you don't have to censor hate speech because people are free to counter it. You are free to speak against what people are doing in this thread, and you're doing so, but your call to have it closed is hypocritical. I'm sorry, but I can't see it any other way. And I definitely find it hypocritical to talk about the right to express an idea with respect to racism and anti-semitism (not what you said explicitly, but that's how it comes across in your direct reply to what I say) and then to say that this is somehow better than the direct abuse of a particular person. "Niggers and Kikes don't deserve to live!!! But of course I don't mean any particular person." How's that any better or more acceptable than "You there, Frank Bloggs, you're a jerk and a racist and I hate you!"? Why should the former be protected under free speech and the latter be censored? You talk about standing up for the underdog, yet you're naive if you think that free speech always favours the underdog. |
|||
|
|
will not Ling Ling you, not ever Member |
I'm glad Dweller posted what he did in saying he's not going to remove the thread, because I don't want to see it removed.
I personally see this thread as an ugly spot on the board, regardless of who it was aimed at. It is good to be reminded of our mistakes and our idiocies. Furthermore, going onto the anti-racism laws, I entirely support legislature defending indivisuals/small comunities against crimes, however I am very much against sensoring someone based on the fact that you disagree with what they say! Bring those Nazies to the front and let them express their views so it can be seen for the idiocy it is. ********************* And I'm better built to boot! ~Ranma |
|||
|
|
Member |
Sing it bro!
And all you monkey humping sons of apes can back the f*ck up right now before I drop some bamboo-chewing science on your unlovable assholes. |
|||
|
|
Goofy Beast Member |
Yeah, because that so worked with Germany in the 1930s... |
|||
|
|
will not Ling Ling you, not ever Member |
Heh, I am a bit naive, but I really do think that Germany in the 1930's is a completly different situation. Other than changing the economic situation, I really don't know if there is anything that could have stopped what happened then (After it reached the critical point). Maybe a different ideology to divert their momentum?
Anyhow, I still stand that people will listen to reason as long as the situation is handled right and they are exposed to reason. But then again, I am naive ********************* And I'm better built to boot! ~Ranma |
|||
|
|
Did something right Member ![]() |
*Shrug* I chose the title based on a post by Panda where he used the phrase "horrible racist". I just pulled the description from his post.
EDIT: Copied post here:
---------------------------------------------------------- "It really is fun to to stick burning objects into various orifices." "Sorry I haven't been around much, but I am easily distracted by shiny objects." "WEIRD! WEIRDY-WEIRDO-WEIRD! WEIRDOPOTTAMUS WEIRDOSAUR! HIM! YOU! WEIRD!"-Mr. Furious |
|||
|
|
Goofy Beast Member |
And that - "as long as the situation is right" - is as vague as hell. I don't know about your neck of the woods, but here young people become neo-Nazis because a) they might come from less well educated, economically disadvantaged families, or b) they're rebelling against what their parents/teachers tell them, or c) because they think it's cool to hate and beat up people, or d) any other reason. They've all got access to the truth about what Nazis did in Germany 1933-1945. They don't care. Listening to reason? They're more likely to kick it half to death and then piss on it. I can definitely accept it if someone says that absolute freedom of speech might not be ideal, but it's the best we can offer ('thin end of the wedge' sort of argument). But bullshit about 'truth will out' simply doesn't work if you look at world history. People act out of want or need, and they rarely want or need truth and reason, it seems. |
|||
|
|
will not Ling Ling you, not ever Member |
It is probably the most tasteless thing I've ever seen on this board. It definitely is an ugly spot on here for a group who prides themselves on intelligent discussion.
It shows a lack of thinking on your part. I know you're not a bad guy, but you definitely screwed up hard core on this one. But like I said before, I absolve you of your wrong doings because of your weakness. Edit'ed to respond to Thirith: I don't know. When I say "situation is right" I should have said, as long as the situation is confronted. While I'll agree with the statement that, "absolute freedom of speech might not be ideal, but it's the best we can offer" I would even perhaps go a step further and say that it's the better of two roads. If you silence someone, it only validates their view and they gain strength. Will the truth win out? Only if it confonts the lies. This message has been edited. Last edited by: Big Ass Panda, ********************* And I'm better built to boot! ~Ranma |
|||
|
|
Goofy Beast Member |
You're welcome.
|
|||
|
|
Member |
ooh ooh absolve me too!
|
|||
|
|
Administrator/Colporteur Member ![]() |
I think a line needs to be drawn between hate speech and racist speech. Both are wrong, and for similar reasons, but the latter if harmful in ways well beyond the emotional, the latter is just . . . wrong.
If I say, "I don't trust Jews," that's a racist statement, and a wrong-headed one, even if it's based on my own experiences. It isn't, in and of itself, damaging. If I say, "I don't trust Jews and I think they shouldn't be able to own business," that's a whole different level of wrong that leads to Kristallnacht. I want people to be able to say the former quite freely so that such statements can be caught and hopefully corrected. While I agree that there's a spectrum that leads a person to first say the first statement and gradually come to agree with the statement, unless we've heard them say the first, there's no chance for rehabilitation. The latter . . . that you have to watch out for. __________ AJGraeme "You see, I have a policy about honesty and ass-kicking: if you ask for it, I have to let you have it." -Taylor Mali "Science is the foot that kicks magic square in the nuts." -Scratch Fury |
|||
|
|
Goofy Beast Member |
Absolutely, Dweller. No one here will be tried, or even charged, if they say "I don't trust Jews." The thing that's important to me is that a black and white view of the issue (i.e. "Any curtailing of free speech is wrong! People should be free to say anything!") isn't really adequate to this complicated, ambivalent, wonderful, fucked up world we live in. Which is why I usually get so frustrated discussing things with ideologues and their principles which are so unflexible that they have little to nothing to do with the real world.
|
|||
|
|
has a beaver that talks Member |
For which one of those two did you mean "the former"? ****************************************** Me in Rock: This Shirt Is Pants | Mr. Fusion Me in blog: izenmania |
|||
|
|
has no member title Member |
Jesus Christ! Panda, what kind of dream land do you live in??
Thirith is a hundred percent correct in his analysis of neonazis and their and the perfect uselessness of exposing them to "reason". What on earth is tasteless about that? It's kind of funny that first of all you were accusing people of not looking reality in the face and then you say completely naive bullshit like "people will listen to reason as long as the situation is handled right and they are exposed to reason." That's not only naive to the extreme it is also dangerous in that it enables the very stupidity to grow that you would want to prevent. History has proved you wrong a hundredfold, Panda! Open your bushy little ears and listen! WTF is so tasteless about what Thirith said? If you mean dragging the Nazis into that, that was your doing, not his. __ The brickchewing, camera flaunting restroom saint formerly known as Babylon the Bride |
|||
|
|
Goofy Beast Member |
He was responding to Tongster, I think. My "You're welcome" was sarcasm, but it didn't exactly make things clearer. |
|||
|
|
has no member title Member |
Rofl!
You guys! As if all the aliases sleazing about the board weren't bad enough. Sorry Panda, I was totally flummoxed by your strange reaction to what I thought was Thirith's post. Sorry if I reacted harshly. __ The brickchewing, camera flaunting restroom saint formerly known as Babylon the Bride |
|||
|
|
Administrator/Colporteur Member ![]() |
I disagree here. Most of the time, bigots are "reasoned" with by being yelled at about how utterly and completely incorrect their opinion is while pages of documentation are shoved into their face. The first step - the first reasonable step - to excommunicating a neo-Nazi, or any other bigot, is to attack the root problem, whether poverty or feelings disenfranchisement or indoctrination. __________ AJGraeme "You see, I have a policy about honesty and ass-kicking: if you ask for it, I have to let you have it." -Taylor Mali "Science is the foot that kicks magic square in the nuts." -Scratch Fury |
|||
|
|
will not Ling Ling you, not ever Member |
lol, I was really really REALLY confused! Gosh, I'd never put him down for saying what he said. It's a very fine difference of opinion. It's two sides of the same coin really. How do you handle it best? Well you probably let the weak ended stuff go but when it gets serious, you step in.
Such as in the media, it shouldn't be tollerated in the slightest (this should be done through self regulation). However someone up on a podium? Well they should be watched closely and as soon as they say something that even boarders a suggestion that violense or some other "real" actions take place, well that should be stopped. edit: @ Dweller I agree with you on that one for the vast majority. Although I am currious how you would fight the indoctrination. ********************* And I'm better built to boot! ~Ranma |
|||
|
|
Did something right Member ![]() |
Again, *Shrug* I'm not seeing an overwhelming need to remove this thread. I've gotten a full spectrum of responses, from people thinking it's funny, to people agreeing, to people saying they wouldn't do it but they understand it, to people being offended. Most of the informally polled responses fall in the "wouldn't do it but understand it" area, which is about what I was aiming for. All in all, I think that's a healthy spectrum of responses for something like this, which was not meant to be warm 'n fuzzy.
---------------------------------------------------------- "It really is fun to to stick burning objects into various orifices." "Sorry I haven't been around much, but I am easily distracted by shiny objects." "WEIRD! WEIRDY-WEIRDO-WEIRD! WEIRDOPOTTAMUS WEIRDOSAUR! HIM! YOU! WEIRD!"-Mr. Furious |
|||
|
| Previous Topic | Next Topic | powered by eve community | Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 |
| Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |