Neil Gaiman    www.NeilgaimanBoard.com    www.NeilgaimanBoard.com  Hop To Forum Categories  Neil's Other Works  Hop To Forums  Sandman    Should Destruction not be elder than Dream?
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
-star Rating Rate It!  Login/Join 
Member
Posted
At the least he should be older than Dream or at the least, very, very close in age. It is known that Destruction is a manifestation of change, and I'm sure that a living thing could change even slightly even before it becomes first self aware of itself.
 
Posts: 33 | Registered: May 14, 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Firekeeper's Sister
Member
Picture of VegaRiad
Posted Hide Post
Well, he is, isn't he? He's actually slightly older than Death, and Death is older than Dream.


-Natalie
----*-*-*-*----
Not really human, just turns into one on the full moon.

I've totally got deviantARTs.
(and now I sell t-shirts too Big Grin! www.cafepress.com/teethinthestars )
 
Posts: 2517 | Location: The bottom of a small bowl of imaginary winged serpents | Registered: March 11, 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
Really? Last I have heard, that the order went from Destiny, Death, Dream then Destruction.
 
Posts: 33 | Registered: May 14, 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of Primate
Posted Hide Post
dread has the order right.

Consider that the thought that something can be changed must come before the change can be done. Dream would be the thought, and Destruction would be the action.


==============
Phantast - Artist Wanted
 
Posts: 1471 | Location: Erie, Pennsylvania, USA | Registered: July 22, 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of dreamingisfree
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by dread:
At the least he should be older than Dream or at the least, very, very close in age. It is known that Destruction is a manifestation of change, and I'm sure that a living thing could change even slightly even before it becomes first self aware of itself.

You have a good point, but I think that change is an element of Death, who comes before Dream, so she has it covered.
It actually makes sense that Destruction follows Dream because Dream could be looked at as the creative impulse of humankind and then it's opposite, the destructive impulse, would follow, for balance ( at least in the way things in the Sandman universe are balanced). Smile
 
Posts: 13 | Location: The Dreaming | Registered: January 21, 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
 Previous Topic | Next Topic powered by eve community  
 

Neil Gaiman    www.NeilgaimanBoard.com    www.NeilgaimanBoard.com  Hop To Forum Categories  Neil's Other Works  Hop To Forums  Sandman    Should Destruction not be elder than Dream?

© YourCopy 2001