It's horribly over detailed, going against wikipedia's guidelines, but it raised it from stub to start. I took the plot as a personal issue, as it was (and still is) my favorite graphic novel. Instead of being frank with the plot, I over indulged in details. That's one of few problems I have with wikipedia: I think it's okay to iclude detail as long as it doesn't have Point of View issues.
If any Sandman experts would like to check it out and give me feedback, it would be greatly appreciated.

This message has been edited. Last edited by: Mw/NNrules,

If you're not aware of it, you may want to take a gander at the Neil wiki.

quote:

Originally posted by aitapata:
If you're not aware of it, you may want to take a gander at the Neil wiki.

I took a look.
In theory, it's a good idea, and probably a good place to bring my editing, but I was dissapointed at how disorganized it was. I'm assuming it's a young wiki though, which lets me excuse it. Unfortunately, I couldn't find a good Sandman page.

Uhhh... if any Sandman aficianados (I know I spelled that wrong, but hopefully everybody understands what I was trying to write) could give me tidbits on the production and writing of the storyarc. I probably won't get to it imediately, but assuming this thread doesn't get deleted, the notes'll always be there.

quote:

Originally posted by Mw/NNrules:
Uhhh... if any Sandman aficianados (I know I spelled that wrong, but hopefully everybody understands what I was trying to write) could give me tidbits on the production and writing of the storyarc. I probably won't get to it imediately, but assuming this thread doesn't get deleted, the notes'll always be there.

This is how it is spelled. I love the power of my Mac: aficionados