Neil Gaiman    www.NeilgaimanBoard.com    www.NeilgaimanBoard.com  Hop To Forum Categories  The World's End  Hop To Forums  Other Writers    Some Guy who does Magic: *CONTAINS OPEN SPOILERS*
Page 1 ... 8 9 10 11
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
-star Rating Rate It!  Login/Join 
Administrator/Colporteur
Member
Picture of Dweller in Darrkness
Posted Hide Post
lg, the teacher thought it was postmodern. I thought it was pompous, which makes it kinda sorta postmodern. Wink

I understand what you mean more now, and I tend to agree. Rowling's statement was something the filmmakers definitely needed to know about - that was part of the context of her comments, that they were thinking of implying a past female love interest, an idea she nixed - but I do agree that since it's not on the printed page, it's the sort of thing you don't have to pay attention to unless you want to.

It's canon, officially, and you're called to write in her universe, you'd better not imply a McGonnogal(sp?)/Dumbledore tryst, but while knowing it makes certain motivations clearer, it isn't vital to the understanding of the story.


__________
AJGraeme
"You see, I have a policy about honesty and ass-kicking: if you ask for it, I have to let you have it."
-Taylor Mali
"Science is the foot that kicks magic square in the nuts."
-Scratch Fury
 
Posts: 43009 | Location: Concord, NH, USA | Registered: July 20, 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
is hogging the Comfy Chair
Member
Picture of Hive
Posted Hide Post
This is from today's Telegraph, and she was also interviewed on the Today Programme this morning:

quote:
JK Rowling, the author of the Harry Potter adventures, has written a new book, but has only made seven copies of it.

Tales of Beedle the Bard is a book of fairy tales handwritten and illustrated by Rowling herself, and each copy is leather-bound and covered in silver and jewels.

Six of the seven copies have gone to people who are “most closely connected to the Harry Potter books over the past 17 years”.

However, the seventh will be auctioned in Sotheby’s in December, with all proceeds going to the Children’s Voice Foundation.

Rowling has also recorded a personal message for the purchaser, saying “to whoever now owns this book, thank you, and fair fortune be yours.”


***********************
There once was a bard of Hong Kong
Who thought limericks were too long.

- Gerard Benson.
 
Posts: 8376 | Registered: April 12, 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Knows what a real civil war should be
Member
Picture of Furious
Posted Hide Post
(I haven't read the rest of this thread)

The last book stank. Harry Potter and the Gaping Plotholes is more like it.

Snape isn't as bad as you think his is (although still a double murderer), Dumbledore isn't as good or brilliant as you think he is (never really saw the 'he's gay' revelation in the text, but his other characteristics/bad judgment were similar to an addict of some sort), and once again Harry still gets his ass pulled out of the fire by external circumstances rather his own talent.

BAH!

Voldemort can kill the Horcrux in Harry but not Harry? Gee, I thought way way back in Chamber of Secrets Harry was bit by a Horcrux-destroying-venom-filled basilisk -- why didn't it die then? Oh yeah, the author didn't think up the Harry-is-a-Horcrux plotline yet...

Never ever again will I read another Rowling book or (pay to) see the movies.

BAH!

Edit: It's a shame...such a great mythology and it's been crapped up...it's The Matrix all over again! Frown

This message has been edited. Last edited by: Furious,
 
Posts: 28135 | Registered: June 25, 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Miss Kitty Fantastico
Member
Picture of Maeve
Posted Hide Post
A month or so ago I tried to read book #1 to Devlin and I just couldn't do it! It was so contrived and wading through the adjectives was just too much. I switched back to Pratchett. much easier.





I would have thought the end of the world is everyone's responsibility, wouldn't you? ~Death in Thief of Time


Minister of Kraftwerk in the Realm of U & P, Order of the Pineapple with frond for advancement in Nap studies.
 
Posts: 14426 | Location: under tangled yarn | Registered: August 09, 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Knows what a real civil war should be
Member
Picture of Furious
Posted Hide Post
I mean, I'll be the first to admit that I can't do any better, but wow, when it's exposition time, you can start speed-reading.

I was hoping the books would have Harry evolve into the hero wizard everyone thought he was by clevering himself out of a few impossible situations, but...I dunno...he's always bailed out of trouble by something...seems the creative well ran dry after she did the 'lets go back in time and fix everything' plotline.
 
Posts: 28135 | Registered: June 25, 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Click here!
Member
Picture of Tismalleen
Posted Hide Post
Personally I didn't mind the good/bad, wise/fool ambivalence - I tend to enjoy that in literature, actually - and I also always found it pretty cool that Harry was no super hero and didn't have or develop any special abilities or talent that would set him above everyone else. Except for the one thing he couldn't do anything about, namely just being the Boy Who Survived. So, sometimes he won by being lucky, sometimes it was help and love from others. In the end, it was also his own courage, though. I think that was quite beautiful.

And that said, I hated the endless camping trip - the first third of the last book. First time I ever got bored with a HP book.

quote:

Voldemort can kill the Horcrux in Harry but not Harry? Gee, I thought way way back in Chamber of Secrets Harry was bit by a Horcrux-destroying-venom-filled basilisk -- why didn't it die then? Oh yeah, the author didn't think up the Harry-is-a-Horcrux plotline yet...


Never thought of that... Sounds like a pretty big plot hole indeed, if that's how it went.


-------------------------------------------------
Sorry, but you are looking for something that isn't here.
 
Posts: 1475 | Location: fluttering about | Registered: September 18, 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Knows what a real civil war should be
Member
Picture of Furious
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Tismalleen:

Never thought of that... Sounds like a pretty big plot hole indeed, if that's how it went.


The excuse will be something like 'because the Horcrux was connected to Harry, his lifeforce yada yada yada'...I hate it when writers break their own rules.
 
Posts: 28135 | Registered: June 25, 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Administrator/Colporteur
Member
Picture of Dweller in Darrkness
Posted Hide Post
Erm, Harry didn't contain a Horcrux, he was a Horcrux, at least in that his soul and Voldemort's were so strongly linked that they experienced one another's lives to an extent. And a Horcrux has to be destroyed beyond any capacity for it to be repaired magically. And Harry was repaired. Magically. I'm not saying that she didn't come up with the requirements for the destruction of a Horcrux with the basilisk/Harry incident in mind, but it's internally consistent.

It isn't the fact that it's basilisk venom that makes it capable of destroying a Horcrux, it's that the venom is capable of destroying something beyond repair that makes it effective.


__________
AJGraeme
"You see, I have a policy about honesty and ass-kicking: if you ask for it, I have to let you have it."
-Taylor Mali
"Science is the foot that kicks magic square in the nuts."
-Scratch Fury
 
Posts: 43009 | Location: Concord, NH, USA | Registered: July 20, 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Knows what a real civil war should be
Member
Picture of Furious
Posted Hide Post
I think I get what you're saying. I'm in the mindset (obviously) of Harry being separate from the Horcrux and thinking that it could be removed from him, much in the same manner Tom Riddle fragmented his soul and removed portions of it to create the Horcruxes in the first place.

Not to mention the fact that a snake's venom doesn't lie in it's fangs, but in special glands, so near-instantaneous Horcrux destruction from a disconnected fang would suggest that Harry wouldn't have lived along for the phoenix to- GAH! WHY DO I DO THIS TO MYSELF?
 
Posts: 28135 | Registered: June 25, 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
 Previous Topic | Next Topic powered by eve community Page 1 ... 8 9 10 11 
 

Neil Gaiman    www.NeilgaimanBoard.com    www.NeilgaimanBoard.com  Hop To Forum Categories  The World's End  Hop To Forums  Other Writers    Some Guy who does Magic: *CONTAINS OPEN SPOILERS*

© YourCopy 2001